TOWARDS THIRD WORLD WAR !!!!!!!!!!!!!

After World War II people around the world thought that it was last major war on Earth.
This does not look appearing now.
In 1944 major countries of world sat in New Hampshire(Bretton wood conference) to declare Dollar as a world currency backed by gold(Gold Standard).
US had reserve gold to print paper money. US started printing money and was enjoying From 1945 to 1965 everything was fine but in 1965 US had war with Vietnam and in the effect of war the US economy started to tumble.
Until 1970 US was printing more and more dollar to overcome financial crisis. This made countries to start disbelieving in dollar and ask for gold in return of dollar.US had printed more dollar than gold it had. Redeem of gold would have destroy US economy.
Therefore, US president Nixon ended gold back dollar and started printing more and more dollar to strengthen the economy.
Dollar value in international market was gradually plunging as it was only paper money not backed by gold.
Nixon took a very smart move, went to Arabs and asked to take dollar in exchange of oil. US also promised to give protection and weapons (This is called Petro-Dollar system).
This was the first seed sown for the current war.
Other OPEC members (Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar,United Arab Emirates and Venezuela) also followed Saudi Arabia exchange policy.
US economy started to emerge but other countries(China and Japan etc) had to make export oriented policies to get dollar to purchase oil.US economy is like a vehicle which can not run without oil.
In 1999 enemy of Dollar had come into the picture "Euro".
In 2000 Iraqi president(pro Russia-China) Saddam Hussain decided to sell oil in Euro. This assured his death warrant . US economy(dollar) might derail if Iraq and other OPEC members follow it.
Therefore in 2003 Bush invaded Iraq on the pretext of chemical weapons to save the dollar and destroy the entire country. After Saddam , Iraq again started selling oil in dollar.
Libya's Gaddafi declared using gold Dinar in exchange for oil in 2010. He also tried to form an African union and was planning to launch a satellite which was going to serve African nations. Gaddafi's step was against US and European nations who have been sucking the entire Africa continent for years. So US and EU invaded Libya and killed Gaddafi.
Syria moved away from the dollar in 06 and Iran in 08.
Now US has to keep Russia and China away from natural resources(oil and natural gas) and has to compete Euro/Yuan/Rubel as well.
Today the US-backed wars in Ukraine and in Syria are but two fronts in the same strategic war to cripple Russia and China and to rupture any Eurasian counter-pole. Natural gas has become the favored “clean energy” source for the 21st Century and the EU is the world’s largest growth market for gas, a major reason US wants to break the Russia-EU supply dependency to weaken Russia and keep control over the EU via loyal proxies like Qatar.
The world’s largest known natural gas reservoir sits in the middle of the Persian Gulf straddling part in the territorial waters of Qatar and part in Iran.
China signed an agreement with Iran to develop gas pipeline infrastructure to bring the gas to China.
In July 2011, the governments of Syria, Iran and Iraq signed a historic gas pipeline energy agreement and this triggered US-Saudi-Qatari war to remove Syrian president Assad.
This pipeline would run from the Persian Gulf(in Iran), to Damascus in Syria via Iraq territory. The agreement would make Syria the center of assembly and production in conjunction with the reserves of Lebanon.
This is a geopolitically strategic space that geographically opens for the first time, extending from Iran to Iraq, Syria and Lebanon.
Shortly after signing with Iran and Iraq, on August 16, 2011, Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian Ministry of Oil announced the discovery of a gas well in the Area of Qarah in the Central Region of Syria near Homs.
Russia, with Assad in power, would be a major investor or operator of the new gas fields in Syria.
Iran ultimately plans to extend the pipeline from Damascus(Syria) to Lebanon’s Mediterranean port where it would be delivered to the huge EU market.
Syria would buy Iranian gas along with a current Iraqi agreement to buy Iranian gas from Iran’s part of South Pars field.
Qatar, today the world’s largest exporter of LNG, largely to Asia, wants the same EU market that Iran and Syria eye.
For that, they would build pipelines to the Mediterranean. Here is where getting rid of the pro Russian-Iranian-Chinese Assad is essential.
In 2009 Qatar approached Bashar al-Assad to propose construction of a gas pipeline from Qatar’s north Field through Syria on to Turkey and to the EU.
Assad refused, citing Syria’s long friendly relations with Russia.
That refusal combined with the Iran-Iraq-Syria gas pipeline agreement in 2011 ignited the full-scale Saudi and Qatari along with US assault on Syria and cause of rise of ISIS.
ISIS is now war army of US+Israel+Saudi Arabia+Qatar and many other countries. US announced attack on ISIS but wanted to capture Syria. Now in counter attack Syrian president called his alliance Russia and China.
Now world is on the verge of polarization, Russia+China+Iran+Syria+Iraq... and US+Israel+Saudi Arabia+Qatar+UK...
US is trying to rapture EU economy to down euro using IMF by weaken its member countries economies. Greece is one of the recent victim (Spain, Italy, Portugal are in queue).
Saudi Arabia is manipulating oil price to weaken Iran indirectly. Russia. China is in currency war with US. China did de-value its currency to compete with dollar(China market crash in Aug-Sept).
France voted against Israel for Palestine recognition as a State in UN in Sept-Oct 2015, and hurt Israel by looking for 2 states solution theory.
France had to pay for this by the recent attacks
China is capturing African countries and making lot of investments. Mali has been recently attacked because its President went to China's door to ask help and get rid of US occupied gold mines.

INDIA'S WORKERS STRIKE, 2ND SEPT.2015

The General Strike called by the ten largest central trade unions CTU’s on Tuesday, September 2 was a tumultuous success. The trade union and communist leaders who had anticipated a maximum of one hundred million workers participating in the strike were flabbergasted at the sight of more than 150 million coming out on a total one-day general strike that paralyzed India
india-general-strikeCPI General secretary S Sudhakar Reddy said, “Great success I should say. [The response] was more than expected. It is one of the biggest actions of working class and manifestation of their unity against anti-labour policies of Government". The response of the biggest left party, the CPI (M), was a bit muted. “The strike was 'successful' despite Centre trying to 'dissuade' workers from proceeding with the agitation at the eleventh minute. Apart from dissuading RSS-affiliated Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh, they could not succeed in dissuading any other CTU from proceeding with the strike”, the party said in a statement. Union leaders claimed that the strike had affected the functioning of essential services like banking, transport and supply of power, gas and oil. The CP-affiliated AITUC (All India Trade Union Congress) secretary Gurudas Dasgupta termed the mobilisation as “magnificent”.
india-general-strike2All those ex-lefts, liberal analysts and the so-called ‘socialists’ and ‘communists’—those merchants of doom and gloom — have been refuted not just by the massive turnout of the workers but by the intensity of the strike. Their analysis and dismissive cynicism towards the role of the Indian proletariat has been proved terribly wrong and absurd. A wave of enthusiasm and courage swept across India on this fateful Tuesday. Even the most right-wing bourgeois television channels and newspapers had to admit the thumping success of this day of action by the Indian working class and the youth. In reality this general strike stunned the anchors of the corporate media and the analysts of the ‘left' who had virtually written off the Indian proletariat as a force to reckon with.
India’s most prominent liberal paper, The Hindu, reported: “Normal life was affected in various parts of the country, including West Bengal, Tripura, Kerala and Karnataka, as 10 CTUs today went on day-long nationwide strike to protest against changes in labour laws and privatisation of PSUs. The strike affected transport, banking operations and other services in various parts of the country".
india-general-strike3The media house that is most representative of the liberal Indian bourgeois, NDTV, reported: “About 15 crore workers are on a nationwide strike and essential services like banking and public transport have been hit in many places… In Kolkata, women activists from the Left were seen being dragged by the police. Banks, shops, and many schools are closed and all public transport is off roads. The bandh [closure] has also impacted southern states. Around 3,500 government-run buses are not running in Hyderabad [Deccan] and public transport has also been hit in Thiruvananthapuram in Kerala. Schools and colleges are closed in Bengaluru. Ten major trade unions have called 'Bharat bandh' over the government's pro-business initiatives, after talks with Finance Minister Arun Jaitley broke down. Many banks have shut their doors for the day all over the country. Long lines of commuters and school children were seen waiting at bus stops in many cities across the country, including national capital Delhi, while passengers were stranded at airports as taxis and rickshaws stayed off the streets.”
Such was the fear struck in the bourgeois by the strike's success that within hours after it ended, news of the strike was removed from the television news bulletins and expunged from the screens of the bourgeois newspaper websites.
Even the Western media could not conceal the huge impact of this strike. The BBC reported in the afternoon: “Workers across India are staging a day-long strike to protest at the economic policies of the government. They say the 'pro-business' policies of the Narendra Modi-led BJP government will put their jobs at risk and hurt ordinary people. The unions are demanding the government drop plans to sell off stakes in state-run companies and change labour laws. Reports say some 150 million workers — mainly in banking, manufacturing, construction and coal mining industries — belonging to 10 major unions are expected to stay away from work on Wednesday. The strike appears to have hit public transport, with long queues of commuters and school children seen at bus stops in many cities, including the capital, Delhi".
2nd Sep JmuThe unions were demanding that the government dump plans to sell off stakes in state-run companies. They are also opposed to the government's proposed labour reforms expected to diminish the influence of trade unions and make the labour market more ‘flexible’. CTU’s 12-point charter of demands also included urgent measures to contain price rises and unemployment, strict enforcement of basic labour laws, withdrawal of the proposed “anti-worker” amendments in labour laws and stopping the disinvestment and privatisation of PSUs. They also demanded universal social security cover all workers and a minimum wage of Rs 15,000 per month. Bank unions were also protesting against the government’s plan to revamp the working of the public sector banks. Several outfits representing informal sector workers also supported the shutdown.
kashmir2Marxist MP Yousaf Tarigami, member of CC of CPI(M) and elected member of Jammu and Kashmir Parliament led thousands of people on 2nd of September.However, the most important aspect of this strike was the molecular pressure that was building up amongst the workers for a long time. Not very long ago, under the previous Congress-led coalition government, there was a similar general strike with the participation of 100 million workers. When the ‘business friendly’ Hindu chauvinist demagogue Narendra Modi won a landslide victory in the elections in May last year and came to power in a BJP government with almost absolute majority in the parliament, the Indian and world corporate bosses were jubilant. The Modi regime started off with an array of ‘reforms’ to boost rates of profits for their clientele. But even with such euphoria of the Hindu right and the reactionary Indian ruling classes, these got stuck in their inception. The seething pressure from below was palpable and even Modi’s regime along with India’s bourgeois opposition parties could neither ignore nor defy it. Paradoxically there was also a mounting pressure from the corporate world on Modi and his government to bulldoze through those ‘reforms’ of cuts, austerity measures and anti-labour policies. His imperialist bosses scolded Modi for not carrying out these ‘reforms’ fast enough. Less than a week ago, The Economist, Modi’s ardent supporter, wrote in its August 29 issue, “The prime minister is a forceful communicator. But he postpones the arduous job of getting things done… Mr Modi cares more for the theatre of politics than the hard grind of passing laws or accomplishing reforms through compromise. A former cabinet minister complains that Mr Modi’s rhetoric is way ahead of his plans... Investors grumble that promises to simplify tax laws, cut corporation tax and privatise state firms have come to little.”
kashmirPerhaps after witnessing this massive general strike The Economist will understand what was actually stopping Modi and of whom he was afraid. Despite these pressures, Modi has carried out unprecedented measures to please corporate capitalism. In their first annual budget, Modi and his finance minister Arun Jaitley slashed an astronomical 25 percent in taxes on corporate incomes. In the meantime, to continue his socio-economic onslaught against the Indian masses, Modi tried to divert attention by churning up the religious sectarianism and whipped up anti-Pakistan chauvinism by his nationalist/Hindutva rhetoric. The military elite and the Islamic fundamentalists were more than happy with Modi across the Radcliff line in Pakistan. The venomous hate speeches of the various groups of the Hindutva from the RSS to VHP [Vishva Hindu Parishad] relentlessly smeared Muslims and Pakistan. This fed directly into the vicious religiosity of the monsters of Islamic fundamentalism whose social base was rapidly eroding. The military skirmishes along the LoC in Kashmir and the international Indo-Pak borders have been increasing with rising casualties, strengthening the reactionary forces on both sides of the divide.
Congress, the main opposition party in India was not only decimated in the May 2014 elections but it is difficult to see how their fortunes will recover. Most other bourgeois parties are regionally limited and are based on caste, creed, ethnic, linguistic, narrow nationalistic, communal and religious prejudices. The Communist parties got the highest seats in the 2005 elections. In the states of Bengal, Tripura and Kerala that were ruled for thirty five years by this Left Front, comprising of the two main communist parties, the CPI and the CPI (M), along with other smaller parties, they carried through policies of neoliberal economics leading to demoralisation and revulsion amongst their mass support base. The land they distributed in West Bengal in 1978 was forcibly extorted from the peasants by the same left government after the 2002 elections. The CPs not only abandoned the programme of socialist revolution a long, long time ago, but their neoliberal economic doctrines were not much different from the social democratic parties of Europe in the last decade, and other bourgeois parties ruling in different states of India, including the BJP.
This led to their disastrous defeats in the subsequent elections. In last year’s election these communist party leaders were campaigning for ‘secularism’, ‘democracy’ and Keynesian capitalist economics. While Modi demagogically called himself a ‘tea vendor’ fighting a Prince born with a golden spoon, referring to Rahul Ghandi, the leader of Congress. This rhetoric only worked because the left parties had abandoned class politics and refused to reject Indian capitalism, which has devastated the lives of India’s oppressed masses, 860 million of whom live in absolute poverty in the notorious filthy and crime-infested slums of India's cities. This led to the historic defeat of the left with the lowest-ever seats in the parliament. This was the ultimate fate of the policy of ‘parliamentary cretinism’ adopted by the CP’s leadership.
In the aftermath of the humiliating defeat in the May 2014 elections most left leaders were in a grim state of hopelessness, cynicism and demoralisation. Some called Modi’s victory the triumph of fascism. Others came up with the perspective of a prolonged period of stark reaction and rejected the possibility of a resurgence class struggle by the Indian proletariat. Some even defected to the BJP and other right-wing parties to continue their perks and privileges of being in government. However, the resounding success of this general strike has not only refuted their perspectives but has brought forward the revolutionary potential of the Indian workers and the youth for the world to see. The trade union leaders had to give way to the rising tide of workers' revolt from below. They were in a way forced to call this general strike. Their credibility and leadership was at stake if they refused to respond to the rising anger of the workers.
However, even with the success of this strike, the onslaught of neoliberal capitalism will stop nor the problems and hardships of the workers be resolved. Negotiations will be protracted and can drag on for months without any positive outcome. The aim of the ruling classes and its Modi regime will be to exhaust the workers and damage their fighting potential and moral. The politicisation of this class struggle is the burning need at this moment in time. There is ferment in the CPs but its degree and intensity is not yet clear. Although they have been decimated in the electoral field no alternative party or tradition of the working classes has emerged as yet. The conflicts in the leadership, especially the CPI (M) are now in the open. Unfortunately, these polemics are not of an ideological or political character but mainly organisational and personal accusations and criticisms. But a whole new generation of youth and activists has emerged in the political arena more than 25 years after the fall of the Berlin wall, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the capitalist counterrevolution in China. The older generation of the leadership and activists of the CPs were demoralised by these colossal historical events. These left leaders and intellectuals lost faith in ‘socialism’, which was in reality its caricature — Stalinism — which they naively or opportunistically followed. This was reflected in their politics of retreats, compromises and capitulations to capitalism for whole period of time. Several retreated even further from the Stalinist theory of two stages to one stage: i.e., bourgeois democracy.
However, the disastrous rule of capitalism in India is creating immense revulsion towards the system. As most parties subscribe to capitalism there seems to be an aversion amongst the masses and the youth to politics and parties in general. Yet in this turbulent period there will be accidental parties and figures emerging in this vacuum and the sharp process of a new political awakening that opens up now. Aravind Kejriwal’s Aam Aadami Party’s ascent to power in Delhi is just one example. But these will be temporary and superficial phenomenon and ultimately as the class struggle surges ahead these will vanish and the impacts of the struggle on the political consciousness of the youth and the workers will open up new avenues for the growth and development of the forces of revolutionary Marxism. However, this will be a protracted process precisely because of the weakness of the forces of Marxism that will constitute the subjective factor for a successful revolutionary transformation. It remains to be seen whether the communist parties can take the leadership of these new waves of class struggle or whether they have been doomed by their long-time compromises with capitalism in the name of democracy, nationalism and secularism. Their refusal to learn from the mistakes of the past and to adopt a revolutionary path for the overthrow of capitalism can lead to their political extinction.
But one thing is certain. This general strike signifies a turning point in the class struggle in the subcontinent. It is a fact of particular importance that this strike succeeded so triumphantly even when its own leaders did not expect such a massive participation and support for this historic landmark. Capitalism as a historically obsolete and economically redundant system has failed to develop or improve India. Rather, it has intensified the poverty, misery, disease, ignorance and deprivation amongst the peoples of India. Even the slightest respite in the plight of the masses cannot be achieved within the confines of this dreaded system. But now the processes will accelerate in this epoch of sharp turns and sudden changes which India has entered. Sooner rather than later the perspective of a revolutionary change will be put on the agenda. This strike action has glaringly exhibited the potential of the Indian proletariat to unite and fight as a class in this vast and diverse land. A socialist revolution here will not only transform and emancipate the masses in India but it will lead to the revolutionary victories throughout the Indian subcontinent, which hosts more than 40 percent of world’s poverty. In India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal, there cannot be separate alienated revolutions but a wave of interconnected revolutionary insurrections leading to the creation of a voluntary socialist federation or a USSR of the South Asian subcontinent. That would in reality mean the salvation of about one fourth of the human race. Its impacts on the world stage are unfathomable!

FIGHTING CORRUPTION

The majority of the young people in our country today are tired of being helpless in the face of corruption at the hands of those in authority, whether they are policemen, petty officials and Panchayats or those in the highest offices of state. These have come to light in scandal after scandal since the decade of the eighties, whether it is the signing of WTO agreements, handing over of coal mines to cronies, the 2G scam and now the involvement of the Minister of Foreign Affairs and a Chief Minister of Rajasthan to allow an alleged fugitive from the Enforcement Directorate with some sixteen charges framed against him, ranging from money laundering to match fixing, to escape justice and possibly the country as well. The fugitive is none other than Lalit Modi, a young man from a wealthy family who began his sordid career with sentence for drug peddling as a university student in USA from which he has never looked back. 
  Now, it has come to a pass where he has successfully compromised the Minister of Foreign Affairs to secretly plead with British authorities to give him a document to leave Britain, while her own ministry fought a case against him in India with her daughter as his lawyer defending him. Also her husband has been a lawyer for Modi for over 22 years, bailing him out a number of times. 
  The other person also compromised in getting Modi off the hook is the Rajasthan Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje Scindia, who has allegedly pleaded his case with a British court on the specific condition that the Indian authorities should not know of it. This is understandable as it was he who bought shares in her son’s company at over 9000 times higher their value. Moreover, the Rajasthan Government has signed an MOU with the Portuguese hospital where his wife was being treated, for some Rs. 60 crores. There is obviously a nexus between these people over decades and the give and take may be shifted over a number of transactions. 
  But to defend them, the Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, has now come out on record that the share deal is merely one between two individual companies and there is nothing wrong with it. It is interesting that a similar excuse was given by the former Congress Chief Minister of Haryana for changing land use in Gurgaon in favor of DLF and Ms. Sonia Gandhi’s son in law Robert Vadra, getting him a windfall profit of over Rs. 500 crores in a land deal allegedly entered by one of his companies with a dud cheque of Rs. 52 lakhs that the DLF ignored despite receiving no money for it. Obviously the disease of corruption is not limited to this or that party. It is systemic. As long as speculative finance capital and free for all profiteering are not controlled such corrupt practices and equally corrupt explanations for them can not be checked. The only way to fight this is to attack the nexus and not the deal. The deal is only one element in a criminal nexus that has to be destroyed. 
  Behind this nexus is the belief that the rich are above the law, or rather , the laws are made to benefit the rich. The only thing the poor can do is to find a rich patron to plead their case for them before the authorities for a bribe. Nothing could be worse than this. It is like how Dronacharya got Eklavya to cut his own thumb in the Mahabharata. The result of such defeatist thinking is that some 920 of the richest Indians have cornered the fifth of the wealth of the country while over half of the hungry and underfed in the world live in India. But the hue and cry that should result from this unusual accumulation of wealth by a handful is not heard. 
  Further, it is shocking that over 3 lakhs of farmers have committed suicide in the country, facing ruin because of bad harvests, loans at high interest, and sky rocketing prices of inputs with no proper minimum support price or government intervention to match them. This should have brought any self respecting parliament to a standstill; but neither the UPA 2 nor the NDA had to face such a challenge for overlooking the needs of a huge majority of the Indian people. On the contrary both these governments sought to make the sale of land from small holders easier for corporates and land mafias. Even laws like the MNREGA have been violated by both the UPA 2 and the NDA governments with impunity and poor people on the verge of starvation are denied wages for more than a year, not given work in the latest phase and certainly not paid unemployment relief. It is time that militant movements are developed from the village level upwards to ensure that farmers can keep their assets in hand and landless labour be given their work, wages, and house sites before any hand over to corporates and speculators. 
  It is also a lie that these new land sharks will develop the land and provide jobs in the non farm sector for those whose assets they have taken over. In fact over 67 % of land given over for SEZs is lying unutilized waiting for its price to rise and speculators to profit from it while cultivators are faced with constantly reduced per capita land availability even when they are capable of increasing production. The NDA government is now hoping to transfer this land that should by law be given back to the original owners after five years, to its land bank. These land banks will become a new source of corruption in the villages. So the nexus between the administration, panchayats and mafias must be targeted, fought against and defeated on the ground. 
  How are we to best accomplish this task ? We must organize peasants for their demands, agricultural labourers and rural landless for their urgent needs and ensure credit, government investment in agriculture, distribution of assets to farmers and landless and work and a living wage for labourers. This is easier said than done. In a society divided among castes and under the control of the rural rich a tough battle has to be fought to educate the rural poor, more than half of whom are illiterate even today. This means that those who are young, educated and determined to fight corruption must turn their eyes to India’s villages today for support and help to organize them to resolve their problems through their own efforts. Ultimately we will only succeed in fighting corruption when the victims of corruption resist it and are prepared to defeat it themselves. Our task as students is to inspire them to do just that. Their resistance will awaken the middle classes in the cities to resist as well.  The price is likely to be high. Every day we hear of journalists and people fighting for rational thinking being killed for exposing the land mafias, sand mafias, human traffickers, criminals and local land lords. They are only targeted because of the lack of organization among the rural poor to defend them. A movement against corruption must defend the lives, livelihoods and rights of the rural masses. This task cannot be accomplished by individual heroes who will only become easy targets for the criminals they are fighting. We require teams of leaders and mass organizations of activists for this job. Therefore rather than individuals going into the villages, teams of students and youth committed to fighting corruption must prepare themselves and go in a planned manner to ensure that a mass resistance to it develops where it is most required. This resistance will have to challenge not only the land mafias, but also caste panchayats and the ignorance, defeatism and despair that the rural masses are victims of. This broad based resistance is likely to be attractive to young people with diverse interests and ideals. Everyone can participate at the levels they are best fitted to tackle and target the sources of corruption in our villages which they feel they are best fitted to fight. Without rooting out corruption in our villages we will fail to root it out in the cities or in the country.
  The young must come forward with their energy and inspiration to accomplish this crucial task at this crucial time. They must be aware that similar resistance can be seen in Greece, Britain, Brazil and many other countries in the world. They must understand that they are not alone and in many countries people have taken resistance to dispossession, unemployment, the price rise and so called austerity measures against the working people to a higher level than we have in our country so far. The September 2nd call of the trade unions and solidarity actions will help to carry forward our struggle against corruption as well in the context of global resistance to neo-liberal policies that it is rooted in.

GOVT MOVE ON AMEDMENT OF LABOUR LAWS-- DESIGN TO IMPOSE SLAVERY

The one year rule of ‘Modi Sarkar’ has been disastrous for the working class. Soon after coming to power the BJP led NDA government initiated hectic moves to bring whole sale anti worker amendments to labour laws to satisfy the employers. These amendments are intended to push out vast majority of even the small section of the working class in our country enjoying some forms of legal protection, out of the purview of labour laws. This was not unexpected. The big national and multinational corporations invested thousands of crores of rupees during the last Parliament elections and left no stone unturned to ensure that the BJP comes to power at the centre. Now it is payback time for the government! Every day, here in the country or on foreign soil, the government is unashamedly exhibiting its determination to serve its corporate masters.

In essence, these labour law amendments whether by the government of India or by different state governments led by the BJP ruled Rajasthan government, are aimed at empowering the employers to ‘hire and fire’ workers at their sweet will. They enable the employers to declare closures/ shut downs and retrench/ lay off workers as well as to resort to mass scale contractorisation. They would push more than seventy percent of the industrial establishments in the country and their workers out of the purview of almost all labour laws. The employers will get a free hand to further intensify their exploitation and squeeze down the workers.   

Labour Laws - More Violations Than Implementations 

 

As is well known, labour laws in our country are more violated than implemented. This is the experience of workers in most of the workplaces across the country. More than sixty percent of the country’s workforce in the organised sector is denied even statutory minimum wages and social security benefits like PF and ESI. Contract workers under many nomenclatures are employed in permanent, perennial and continuous jobs in total violation of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act. Even the government run establishments and departments are not free from this deplorable practice. Around 50% of workers in the public sector and 70% in the private sector are contract workers. Other laws pertaining to working hours, overtime work, safety at workplace etc are also being flagrantly violated. In many industrial and service units, 12 hours work without overtime wage has become the norm today. Even where overtime wages are paid, they are far below the statutory double rate wages.

In the background of the global crisis and the following gloom in our country’s economy, the entire burden is being passed on to the workers. Closures, lay off, shut downs have become widespread. Majority of them are, however, not officially reported. But even those officially reported figures are alarming. According to the official reports, more than 19% of the 13.70 lakh registered companies in the country have closed down by the end of December 2014. 56008 out of the 2.79 lakhs registered companies in Maharashtra, 41629 out of the 1.78 lakh registered companies in West Bengal and 41458 out of the 2.57 lakh registered companies in Delhi downed their shutters. Most of these closures/ shut downs and resultant retrenchments involving several middle and large enterprises are illegal. These include MNCs like Maruti Suzuki in Haryana, Nokia and Foxconn in Tamil Nadu, Jessop, Hind Motors, and several jute mills and tea gardens in West Bengal etc. Yet no action has been taken against any of these owners. They enjoy the blessings and patronage of the government. 

Suppression of labour rights and inhuman loot and plunder of working people are integral parts of the neoliberal economic policy regime. Under these policies being implemented by successive governments at the centre during the last more than two decades, the share of wages in the industrial sector have been continuously declining from around 30% in 1982-83 to 12.9% in 2012-13 while the share of profits increased from around 20% to 50% during the same period, even while labour productivity has been continuously increasing. According to the Annual Report of the Labour Ministry, labour productivity in India measured in terms of GDP per person employed per hour is USD 4.17, i.e. around 250.20 or Rs 2000 per day. The extent of exploitation of the workers becomes glaringly visible when this is compared to the average statutory minimum wages prevalent in different states/ sectors.

Under neoliberal regime, a jungle raj is being unleashed at workplaces all over the country. It is not without reason that, today, more than ninety percent of disputes between employers and workers throughout the country relate to only implementation of labour laws and nothing else. In this twenty first century we are living in such an obnoxious situation in a so called civil society that workers face victimisation and oppression from both the employers and government when they agitate for implementation of laws passed by the Parliament! 

It is to make the state sponsored violation of labour laws hassle free and smooth that the government seeks to curb and suppress trade unions using the state machinery. Forming trade unions and registering them are becoming increasingly difficult, even impossible in some states. Thousands of applications for registration of trade unions are gathering dust in the labour departments in almost all the states, in brazen violation of the Trade Union Act. 

With the present BJP government coming to power at the centre, this has assumed an even more aggressive character. The labour law amendments and the bundling them together into Labour Codes are all measures to legalise what till today are legal violations and attacks on the hard won rights of the workers. This intention is sought to be masked with attractive slogans like ‘job creation’, ‘simplification’, ‘rationalisation’, ‘ease of doing business’, ‘attracting investment’ etc to deceive the gullible. It is not only necessary for the working class to understand the real nature of these labour law amendments and their implications on their working conditions. It is also necessary to expose the myths behind these slogans among the people and gain their support in the struggle against not only the anti worker labour law amendments but also the anti people neoliberal policies.

BJP Govt. In Rajasthan Leads the Way 

Rajasthan government all along had a very bad reputation about labour law enforcement. Thousands of complaints of violation of all labour laws, related to minimum wages, contract labour, PF, ESI, working hours, unlawful retrenchment etc have been piling up for years without any redressal in almost all the industrial areas in the state.

In August 2014, the BJP government in Rajasthan has amended the Industrial Disputes Act, Factories Act, Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act and Apprentices Act. Several atrocious anti worker provisions have been incorporated in these amended Acts. The BJP led government at the centre has recommended these to all the state governments as a model to attract investments.

The amended Rajasthan Industrial Disputes Act empowers the employers to retrench workers at will, without prior permission of the government in all establishments employing up to 300 workers. It denies trade unions in any establishment the right to represent the grievances/demands of the workers unless they have at least 30% membership among the workers of the concerned establishment. Moreover, almost all provisions protecting the interests of contract labour, particularly the responsibility of the principal employer, have been removed. The definition of ‘go slow’ has been widened in the Act, enabling the employer to blame the workers for any failure in production or operation. In an overwhelming majority of industries in Rajasthan, the employers are now free to retrench the workers at their will; they can freely engage contract workers in permanent and perennial jobs and denying them all rights to statutory wages and social security; they are free to victimise workers as per their whims and fancies. 

The amendments to Factories Act has increased the threshold limit of employment for the factories operating without power from 20 to 40; for the factories operating with power the threshold level has been raised from 10 to 20. Under the amended Act, the court cannot take cognisance of any complaint related to violation of law against the employer without prior written permission from the state government. On the other hand, punishments for violation of labour law have been relaxed. Thus changes a large number of factories and workers have been pushed out of the coverage of the Factories Act. 

The amendments to Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act also follow the same line. All contractors employing up to 49 workers have been removed from the purview of its coverage.  In effect, this means that almost all, if not all, contract workers are thrown out of the coverage of almost all labour laws. It also encourages the employers to convert the entire workforce in any establishment into contract workers.

The amendment to Apprenticeship Act provides scope for the employers to replace regular workers, even contract workers with apprentices by paying them only ‘stipend’, a small fraction of the wages and forcing them to work for several years without giving them the certificate.

In sum, these amendments to labour laws give the capitalist class total freedom to loot and exploit the workers. They are meant to legalise and legitimise all those attacks of the employers on workers which were till now against the law. They will establish a jungle raj at workplaces. As a result of these amendments, 7252 factories employing less than 300 workers each, out of total 7622 factories in Rajasthan come under the ‘hire & fire’ regime. All of the more than two lakhs contract workers are thrown out of the coverage of all labour laws including Contract Labour (R&A) Act. At least 70 per cent factories and their workers are removed from coverage of Factories Act.     

Several other state governments including Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Haryana etc have followed in the footsteps of Rajasthan government and willingly implemented the recommendations of the government of India. They have passed the bills amending the labour laws and sent for the assent of the President. Several other state governments including in Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh etc have announced their intentions to do the same. 

Moves By The Central Govt. 

 The BJP government at the centre has taken up labour law amendments as of topmost priority on the plea of attracting investment in its ‘Make in India’ campaign and climb up the ladder of ‘ease of doing business index’.

It has been posting its proposals to amend the labour laws in the website without any prior discussion with the trade unions. Two Acts – the Apprenticeship Act and the Labour Laws (Exemption from furnishing returns and maintaining of registers by certain establishments) have already been passed by the Parliament. 

Apprenticeship Act

The government of India has already amended the Apprenticeship Act. The definition of ‘workers’, under the amended Act, has been changed to include contract workers, casual workers and daily rated workers. This allows deployment of more apprentices as a ratio (30%) of total workers in the establishment. It provides enhanced flexibility to the employers to decide new trades for apprentices. It encourages and facilitates the employers to replace contract/ casual/ temporary workers and even regular workers with comparatively low paid apprentices in the production process and thereby reduce the overall labour cost. The section providing the penalty of imprisonment for violation has been totally deleted. Penalty for violation is now limited to a fine of Rs 500. The impact of this amendment can be understood when we note that already the practice of using apprentices/ trainees in regular production jobs is widely prevalent including in major automobile companies like Maruti Suzuki.

This transfers all authority from the Central Council to the State Apprenticeship Council under the state governments. Practical shop floor level training of apprentices has been outsourced with a portion of the cost being borne by the government.

Labour Laws (Exemption from Furnishing Returns and Maintaining of Registers by Certain Establishments) Amendment Bill 2011

The amended Act raises the threshold level employment from 19 to 40 for any establishment to be treated as small establishment. On the pretext of simplifying the procedures for filing returns and maintaining registers, the amended Act virtually exempts these establishments from 16 major labour laws including Factories Act, Payment of Wages Act, Minimum Wages Act, the Weekly Holidays Act, Plantation Labour Act, Contract Labour (R & A) Act, Building and Other Construction Workers’ Act, the Payment of Bonus Act, the Equal Remuneration Act etc. At the present level of technology, large number of establishments having large capital investment and high level of turnover and profit employ less than 40 workers. According to some estimates, more than 72% of factories in the country will now find it much easier to violate all these 16 labour laws with impunity subjecting workers to more fierce exploitation. 

Factories Act 

Through amendment of section 56 of the Factories Act, the spread-over of time period within which a worker can be detained for getting his work for eight hours including lunch recess is proposed to be increased from 10.5 hours to 12 hours if state govt is so satisfied. As per existing provision increase of the spread-over from 10.5 hrs to 12 hrs could be done only when the Chief Inspector of factories would, giving specific reasons in writing, allow such increase.  Such concurrence by Chief Inspector would naturally require due inspection process involving all concerned. Following the amendment, the State Govts can straightway increase the spread-over to 12 hrs without the concurrence of Inspector. Provision for ascertaining actual and technical necessity through inspection for increasing the spread-over to 12 hrs is replaced by “satisfaction of the state govt or in that matter the bureaucracy” making a bigger way for manipulation and manoeuvres by employers.  Increase in spread- over would allow the employers to detain the workers longer hours in the workplace without any extra remuneration and will add to their harassment. 

Through amendment of section 64 and 65, the existing limitation on overtime work of 50 hours per quarter has been straightway increased to 100 hours and through provision of exemptions by state govt through the Chief Inspector such overtime work can be extended to 125 hours in so called “public interest”. This amendment along with the enhancement of spread-over period will lead to harassment of workers and make way for victimisation. Secondly enhancement of overtime work will directly affect the employment generation as well as will enable the employer to economise in labour cost. Through amendment of section 66, restriction and regulation on deployment of woman workers in night shift is being sought to be liberalised and relaxed.  

And the most retrograde of all above, is that the Amendment Bill proposed to empower the state governments to freely increase the threshold level employment, for the factory to be covered by Factories Act, subject to a ceiling of forty. Given the race between the states to attract investment, this is most likely to promote an ugly competition between the state governments to appease the capitalist lobby by pushing majority section of the workers out of the coverage of the labour laws.  

What will be the implications of these changes for the workers? According to the Report of Annual Survey of Industries 2011 -1 2, published in 2014, 125301 factories, or 71.31% if the total 175710 factories in the country, employ less than 50 workers. Most of them employ less than 40 workers. All these factories and their workers would go out of the coverage of Factories Act due to the increase in threshold limit of employment. Thus overwhelming majority of the total 13429956 workers including 3610056 contract workers would be impacted by the amendments to the Factories Act. 

The Small Factories and Other Establishments (Regulation of Employment & Conditions of Services) Bill 2014 

The BJP led government posted a Bill titled the Small Factories and Other Establishments (Regulation of Employment & Conditions of Services) Bill 2014   in the Labour Ministry’s website. Later it was sent to the central trade unions for their comments. This was later followed with a tripartite discussion. CITU has totally rejected the proposal.  

This bill is even more atrocious. Irrespective of usage of power or not, all the factories employing up to 40 workers are termed as small factories and pushed out of the purview of the Factories Act. Not only that. All the small factories so defined will also be out of purview of 14 basic labour laws viz., Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, Payment of Wages Act, Minimum Wages Act, Payment of Bonus Act, Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, Employees Provident Fund Act, Employees State Insurance Act, Maternity Benefit Act, Equal Remuneration Act, Employees Compensation Act, Inter State Migrant Workmen( Regulation of Employment & Conditions of Service) Act, Shops & Establishment Act, Child Labour(Prohibition & Regulation) Act etc. This means workers in the establishments employing up to 40, which constitute around 80% of country’s industrial workforce will be at the mercy of the employers in respect of every aspect of the working conditions and employment rights from working hours, safety, social security, trade union rights and grievance redressal, equal remuneration, maternity benefit, in short, they will be thrown into a condition of virtual slavery.   

Latest Move of combining labour laws into Labour Code 

Recently the government of India has started a process of comprehensive dismantling of whatever minimal protection the labour laws were providing to the workers. It may be remembered that the attempts to change the labour laws, particularly the Industrial Disputes Act, at the behest of the employers date back to the seventies and have been going on for decades now. These have intensified under the neoliberal regime. However the governments could not succeed till now because of the stiff resistance from the working class and the trade union movement. 

Now the BJP led government has changed tack. Instead of attempting amendments to such basic individual laws as the Industrial Disputes Act which would evoke strong united resistance from all sections of the workers, it has decided to bundle up 44 labour laws into 5 Labour Codes under the pretext of rationalisation and simplification. Two such Labour Codes, the Labour Code on Wages bill and the Labour Code on Industrial Relations have been placed on public domain by the Labour Ministry. These aim to totally disarm the working class and prevent it from getting organised and fight for its rights. At the same time the employers are being gifted with more powers to exploit the workers and suppress any resistance. 

Labour Code On Wages Bill 

This Bill seeks to combine four wage related legislations viz., Minimum Wages Act, Payment of Wages Act, Payment of Bonus Act and Equal Remuneration Act into one labour code. 

It is aimed at converting the law virtually into a toothless piece of legislation making enforcement and implementation casuality. The concept of inspection for the purpose of enforcement has been given a go-bye as inspectors will be replaced by facilitators. The facilitators shall conduct inspection only in accordance with the scheme notified by the appropriate government from time to time. Thus the binding character of the provisions of inspection/enforcement mechanism is totally diluted making other provisions of the law practically meaningless to workers.  Some of other retrograde features of proposed wage code bill are the following:

The Equal Remuneration Act has been totally diluted to restricting gender discrimination only to payment of wages, doing away with other types of discrimination related to recruitment, conditions of service such as promotion, vocational training etc. 

Having ratified ILO convention no 111 it is obligatory for the government of India to end discrimination in respect of wages and conditions of service between different sets of workers doing same or equal value of work. In the face of massive contractorisation at the workplaces, this issue is most crucial for the hundreds of lakhs of contract workers across the country. The wage code bill should have made provisions for ending such discrimination. Instead, the government is going ahead just in the opposite direction to further aggravate such discrimination. Amendments to Contract Labour (R&A) Act in the same lines as the Rajasthan and other state governments will deny all contract workers in the private sector and large sections in PSUs the coverage of almost all labour laws. The employees in more than 80% of factory establishments and more than 90% workforce in the services sector will be totally under the tyranny of the employers’ class. 

The definition of employer and employee and also ‘competent authority’ in the proposed wage code bill is vague giving room for misinterpretation to the disadvantage of the workers. 

The concept of schedule of industries/establishments has been done away with in the proposed wage code bill. Does it mean that the minimum wages, to be decided by either state or central government, will be the same for all industries? There is no answer. Further, according to the bill, minimum wages will be decided by the state government. Does it mean that the responsibility of minimum wages, so long vested with the government of India in respect of certain sectors ensuring a national level uniformity, will now be transferred to state governments? If so, what will happen to national level parity of wages so long prevalent in these sectors? The bill remains totally vague on these aspects. 

The bill provides for advisory boards for recommending minimum wage, which appears not to be mandatory. But it is totally silent on the consensus recommendation of the 44^th Indian Labour Conference on minimum wages. The 44^th ILC reiterated the formula for fixing minimum wages as recommended by the 15^th Indian Labour Conference along with direction of Supreme Court in Raptakos & Brett case. For the sake of fairness and propriety, this wage fixation formula should have been incorporated in the Wage Code Bill. But this government, committed as it is, to the employers and corporates shamelessly and deliberately ignored this aspect. Wage fixation has been left totally to the arbitrary discretion of the state governments. 

Governments have also been vested with the power to make any changes in the time limit for payment of wages. The draconian provision for deducting eight days wages for one-day strike has been retained in the proposed bill, if the strike is considered illegal by the government. And, no strike can ever be legal, if the proposals made in the Labour Code on Industrial Relations are enacted.

The right of the workers or their unions to question the accuracy of the balance sheet of the company or demand clarifications, to ascertain ‘allocable surplus’ while bargaining for bonus above the minimum level, which is available in the present Bonus Act is totally done away with in the proposed labour code on wages. It also empowers the employers not to enclose any information contained in the balance sheet, if they so want. This is nothing but abrogation of workers’ right to collective bargaining in respect of bonus by the government. 

Labour Code on Industrial Relations Bill

This bill merges three existing Acts - Trade Unions Act 1926, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946, and the Industrial Disputes Act 1947.

The basic purpose is to provide a comprehensive instrument for the employers’ class to suppress the workers, drastically curb workers’ rights to protest and agitate and press for their grievances, to prune trade union rights to the extent of making it almost impossible even to form a trade union.  It is nothing but a direct affront on the rights to freedom of associations and collective bargaining as envisaged in the ILO core conventions no 87 and 98. It is a blatant attempt by this government to ensure a trade union free workplace for its corporate masters.

According to this code on industrial relations, it is necessary for a trade union to have 10% of the workers in an establishment or industry or 100 workers, whichever is less, as applicants for registration.  Although it provides for granting of registration of union within 60 days from the date of receipt of the application subject to application being in order, it vests wide discretionary powers with the Registrar under section 10 of the bill to grant or not to grant or reject registration. Wide powers have also been vested with the registrar for cancellation of registration of any trade union.

All the office bearers of the trade unions in the organised sector must be persons actually working in that industry. No outsider is allowed. Here office bearer means committee member also. As per existing law, one third of the office bearers could be non-worker organisers/whole-timers. For unorganised sector, not more than two non-worker/whole-timers (instead of existing 50% of the committee members) will be allowed to become office bearer of the union.  Any office bearer of a registered trade union could be disqualified if he or she is already office bearer of 10 unions. Office bearers of trade union can also be disqualified by Industrial Tribunal but criteria of such decision by Industrial Tribunal has not been spelt out giving scope for arbitrary decision.

Despite so many restrictions in formation of trade union in an establishment, granting of recognition and negotiating right to the trade union continues to remain the absolute prerogative of the employer. The demand of the trade unions for making recognition of trade union mandatory in all establishments has been totally ignored.

Right to hire and fire has been given to employer in all establishments employing up to 300 workers. In these establishments, employers are not required to take prior permission of the government for retrenching workers or closing down establishments. This means more than 90 per cent of the workforce in the factory sector  and almost all the contract workers in manufacturing sector will come under ‘hire and fire’  regime. They will be at the mercy of the employers in respect to their employment. This will ultimately impact all other lawful rights of the workers. The employers can ignore or deny these rights as per their sweet will.

The retrenchment compensation, of course, is proposed to be enhanced to 45 days per year of service rendered. But this means nothing to a worker losing his livelihood owing to the lust for profit of the employer. Even in establishments employing more than 300, the appropriate government has been vested with all powers to exempt them from their obligation of taking prior permission for retrenchment and closure. Can criminality go any further?

This labour code on industrial relations also empowers the employers to unilaterally change the service conditions of the workers. They are required to give 21 days’ notice for making such change which is provided by the existing Act also. What is new in this bill is that after 21 days, the employers can unilaterally impose those changes even during the pendency of conciliation proceedings in the labour department or case in Tribunal on those changes based on disputes raised by the union/worker.

The bill imposes several restrictions amounting to virtual ban on strikes and collective agitations by the workers. The right to strike and collective agitation by the workers will be snatched away. As per existing Act, workers/unions are required to give 14/21 days notice for going on strike in public utility services. According to this bill, six weeks’ notice is required to be served before going on strike in all establishments whether public utility services or not. Conciliation proceedings will be deemed to have started on the date on which strike notice is received by the conciliation officer, irrespective of whether conciliation has been called by him or not. Workers cannot go for strike during pendency of conciliation proceeding and up to seven days after conclusion of conciliation. This makes it virtually impossible for the workers and their unions to go on a legal strike. The Bill also proposes to introduce ban on agitations like go-slow, demonstration etc during pendency of conciliation proceedings. Definition of strike has also been arbitrarily extended for casual leave availed by fifty percent or more workers in the establishment.

Huge penalties ranging from Rs 20000 to Rs 50000 or imprisonment of one month or both are sought to be imposed on workers for participating in a so called illegal strike. Incitation or helping a strike action too attracts a huge fine ranging from Rs 25000/- to Rs 50000/- or one month imprisonment or both. 

While retaining the employers’ prerogative to recognise or not to recognise the union or negotiate with it on issues that have been raised, the bill severely restricts the workers’ right to access justice through adjudication/ tribunal etc. According to the section 95 (4) of the bill, workers’ side would be entitled to legal representation in any proceedings before a tribunal, only with the consent of the employers. As per section 95(3), no party to a dispute shall be entitled to be represented by a legal practitioner in any conciliation proceedings or in proceedings before a court. These restrictions are only designed to put the workers and their unions into difficulty.

Restrictions are imposed on the Tribunal itself in the matter wording their awards. Section 70 of the bill provides that the award of the Tribunal shall not contain any information obtained in the course of investigation or enquiry which is not available otherwise than through evidence given before the Tribunal, if the firm or company in question has made a request in writing to that effect. This, while intruding upon the Right to Information, would also create problem for the workers and their unions to fight the case of appeal against the award of the Tribunal in higher court. Further, section 58 restricts the power of Tribunal in the case on discharge/dismissal of workers only to rely on materials on record and debarred to take any fresh evidence in relation to the matter. 

On the other hand, numerous provisions have been incorporated on almost every aspect of industrial relations to empower the appropriate governments to exempt the employers from whatever minimum obligations they have even under the changed laws. For example, section 97 says that if the appropriate government is satisfied that adequate provisions exist for investigation and settlement of disputes within the establishment, it may exempt the establishment from any obligations under the changed law. The government can also exempt any establishment from the obligation of giving 60 days’ notice for the closure and of providing compensation of 45 days’ per year of service rendered for closure/ retrenchment and allow payment of only 3 months’ pay. The government can also exempt even establishments employing more than 300 workers from observance of procedures/ formalities/ obligations required under the law. However, no consideration of any sort is shown for workers and trade unions.   

This is how the present BJP led government seeks to push the workers who produce the wealth of the nation and revenue for the exchequer into slavery. If this government is not unashamedly corporate servile, what is?

The Labour Ministry has called two formal tripartite meetings to discuss these labour codes. All the central trade unions have unanimously rejected the proposals, while the government and the employers’ organisations have ganged up as usual in support.

Onslaught on PF and ESI

The social security rights of the workers provided under the EPF and ESI Acts are also not spared by the present government, which is determined to demolish and destroy these to favour the market forces.

Without even consulting the EPFO, the Finance Minister announced in his Budget speech that Rs 6000 crores from EPF fund would be utilised for general old age pension, which is totally unlawful as EPF funds can only be utilised for the benefit of EPF subscribers. He also announced government’s intention to make EPF optional in favour of the New Pension System designed to utilise pension funds for speculation in stock market. Even before this years’ budget is presented to the Parliament, the Finance Ministry notified diversion of minimum 5% and up to 15% PF accumulation to stock market totally ignoring the unanimous opposition from the entire workers’ group in the Central Board of Trustees. Now the government has proposed to amend the EPF Act to make EPF scheme optional for workers in favour of New Pension Scheme. While all the trade unions rejected the proposals, the employers’ group totally supported the project of looting the hard earned life time savings of the workers.

Similarly the government has mooted a proposal to amend the ESI Act to make ESI optional in favour of medical insurance. In their eagerness to benefit the employers’ class the government totally ignored the fact that ESI not only offers comprehensive medical benefits to the enrolled workers and their dependents but also provides other benefits like cash benefits in times of physical distress due to sickness, temporary or permanent disability, and confinement for insured women. Dependents of insured persons who die in industrial accidents, employment injuries or occupational hazards are entitled to monthly pension under ESI. Whereas, medical insurance provides medical benefits only for in patient treatment for the insured person limited to the insured amount, ESI provides full medical benefits including out patient treatment to the subscriber workers and their dependents for a nominal subscription.

The main purpose behind these evil designs is to provide business to the private insurance companies that have mushroomed owing to the opening up of the insurance sector to private players, both national and foreign, under the neoliberal policy regime. This was affected by amending the Insurance Act. One misdeed is promoting another, in the process putting the social security protection of lakhs of workers at stake.

Deceptive ploy of Announcement of Social Security Scheme for Unorganised Sector

While aggressively pursuing their project for dismantling the entire labour legislation and enforcement machinery, meant for mainly the organized sector establishments, the government has been unscrupulously trying to project itself as pro labour by announcing some welfare and pension schemes for unorganised sector workers with great fan fare. It has announced three such schemes, Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana, Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana and Atal Pension Yojana with media blitzkrieg. Despite carrying the tags of Prime Minister and the name of a former Prime Minister, the schemes are all contributory without any financial support from the government.  There is no implementation machinery. And what are the schemes? Atal Pesion Yojana is the old Swabalamban scheme introduced during the UPA-II regime with pension guaranteed depending upon the contribution of the worker. Likewise, Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana and Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana are modifications of already existing Aam Admi Bima Yojana. It is now expected that the new schemes will replace the earlier schemes. None of those earlier schemes could cover even an insignificant segment of 45 crore unorganised sector workers. In a span of 8 years, the Rastriya Swayasthya Bima Yojana could register only around 3.85 crore people, majority of who are from the unionised segments of unorganised workers like construction, private transport etc. Efficacy of these new schemes to benefit the unorganised sector workers are yet to be seen.

Lie Campaign to Befool People

                                               

The irony is that such inhuman attacks on the working people are being sought to be justified by the government through a total lie campaign putting Goebbels to shame. It is being claimed that these changes in labour laws would attract investment and generate employment. This in essence means that giving total liberty to retrench workers will encourage the employers to employ more. This has no basis and is contrary to all available evidence. The reality is just the opposite. As has already been mentioned, labour laws in our country are more violated than implemented. Despite this, during last three decades, employment growth rate in organised sector continued to remain negligible. The period 2005-2010 witnessed the highest GDP growth rate at 8.5% annually on an average. But employment growth rate collapsed from 2.7% during 2000 – 2005 to mere 0.7% during 2005 - 10.

During the entire three decades long neoliberal policy regime, the productivity of labour in organised sector has consistently increased. But their share as wages has gone down consistently in real terms. Along with this, the number of regular employment in organised sector consistently declined. The number in the unorganised sector has been consistently increasing reaching almost 90 per cent of the total workforce in the country. What is more alarming is that the permanent workers in the organised sector are increasing being  replaced by contract and temporary workers with working conditions similar to those in the unorganised sector. This indicates that the employers in the organised sector have been seeking to drastically cut down on their labour costs to maximise their profits even in the midst of the economic slow down. They have been shifting to informal low paid employment taking advantage of the unemployment among skilled and young workforce in the country.

But there is a limit to manage the slowdown and economic gloom when impoverishment among the mass of populace got widened and deepened. So despite a low-wage scenario throughout the country, manufacturing sector’s growth started dipping since last couple of years reaching a negative figure in the last quarter of the last financial year. This phenomenon explodes the myth that ‘hire & fire’ regime and suppression of labour will lead to increase in employment.

This is the reality. Not only India, but the entire world is witnessing the same phenomenon. The World Employment Report published by ILO had once observed that the empirical evidences of employment scenario show that the countries with higher labour flexibility do not have any brighter performance in employment generation either. Subsequent ILO observations year after year confirmed the same reality.  Hence the lie campaign justifying the move for retrograde pro employer amendments in labour laws by the Govt totally exposes their servility to the interests of corporate/big business, both domestic and foreign.

In fact, such all out onslaught on the working class and the bid to impose slavery on them is integral to corporate sectors’ desperate bid to tackle the deepening crisis the entire capitalist system is engulfed in; the present right-wing Govt in the centre, as the most subservient instrument of the corporate lobby, both domestic and foreign, is operating in that direction to perpetrate loot on peoples’ livelihood and national assets and to weaken the working class movement through such all out onslaught on workers’ rights and livelihood. What could not be done during last six decades in respect of pro-employer amendment in labour laws is being sought to be achieved by the Narendra Modi Govt in one year’s time. Working class movement is being targeted to facilitate hurdles-free crime on people and the nation.

United Combat –the Need of the Hour

These atrocious attacks on the working people of the country, who create wealth and build the nation, on whose labour rests the profit of the employers should be combated resolutely.  The lie campaign by the stooges of the capitalist class, the anti worker character of the neoliberal policies and the politics behind these policies must be thoroughly exposed.

It is to resist and repulse these attacks on the working class that the united trade union movement gave the call for a countrywide general strike on 2^nd September 2015. This strike must act as a strong warning to the BJP led government that the working class of the country, which has a great history of struggles and sacrifices, is not going to let these attacks pass. In its fight against the attacks on its basic rights the working class has to seek and gain the support of all sections of the people. Resistance to atrocious design of the corporate-servile Govt to accelerate the loot on the workers, on the people, on the national assets and the nation as a whole must be heightened by rallying mass of the people in such resistance struggle.